Procurement Playbook

Which Courts have Jurisdiction to Consider Appeals of Maritime CDA Claims?

Maritime government contracting is a multi-billion dollar industry involving the Navy, Army, Coast Guard and other agencies. Most contractors are familiar with the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR) 33.211 provision at the end of each contracting officer’s (“CO’s”) decision on a Contract Disputes Act (“CDA”) claim stating: “Instead of appealing to the agency board of contract appeals, Read More…

Key Ingredients for a Successful Request for Equitable Adjustment

A Request for Equitable Adjustment (REA) is not defined by the Federal Acquisition Regulation (FAR), but is only referenced therein.  What then, is an REA?
REAs are requests for additional monies or time based on contract clauses that provide for such relief, for instance the Changes clause of the contract or the Differing Site Conditions clause.  Read More…

Does a Contracting Officer’s Mistake about the Reasons for a Termination Constitute Bad Faith or an Abuse of Discretion?

When a government contractor is terminated for reasons other than default, the response from the contractor is often to evaluate the contracting officer’s decision and rationale for the termination and determine if an appeal is warranted.  Government contractors sometimes appeal a contracting officer’s decision to terminate their contract by alleging bad faith and an abuse of discretion.  Read More…

Tribal Employees Potentially Liable Under False Claims Act, Washington Federal Court Finds

A federal judge in the Western District of Washington has ruled that tribal employees may still be liable in their individual capacities under the False Claims Act, even if Native American tribes themselves are protected from such suits by sovereign immunity. This interpretation could have important implications for Alaska Native-owned and Native American-owned businesses as federal courts across the country confront a range of tribal sovereignty issues in the coming months. Read More…