Oles Morrison’s Howard Roth and Jedidiah Blake set new protest jurisdiction precedent at the U.S. Court of Federal Claims in Hydraulics International, Inc. v. United States!
The court held it had jurisdiction over a bid protest challenging an Other Transaction Authority (OTA) award made in connection with a potential future procurement. For the first time, the court exercised its jurisdiction over a prototype OTA. The Government spends billions of dollars on prototype OTAs, which are transactions that can result in the exclusion of a bidder from consideration for a follow-on production contract. The decision is noteworthy because the court found the OTA language at issue — i.e., “may result in a production contract” — is sufficient for the court to have jurisdiction. Such language is standard in OTA prototype awards, therefore the court’s decision opens the door for contractors to challenge prototype OTA awards to competitors at the court