Skip to Content
Technical Excellence in Government Contracts
and Construction Matters Since 1893.
Smith Currie Oles Morrison

Common Bid Protest Mistakes: Extension of the Due Date for Comments Does Not Toll Timeliness Requirements for Asserting Supplemental Protest Grounds

By on September 24, 2014 | Posted in Bid Protests

This is the first in a series of posts highlighting common mistakes made (by protestors) in bid protests at GAO.  Today’s post discusses a mistake related to the deadline for filing supplemental protests when an extension is granted for filing comments on the agency report.  This mistake is made by […]

Terminated for Default? Debarment Could Be In Your Future

By on September 22, 2014 | Posted in Suspension and Debarment

Debarment is not just for ethics violations anymore. Suspending and Debarring Officials are looking to a new source for referrals – Contracting Officers. FAR 9.406-2(b)(1)(i)(A) and FAR 9.406-2(b)(1)(i)(B) allow Suspending and Debarring Officials to debar companies for a history of performance issues or a willful failure to perform in accordance […]

SBA Uses “Adverse Inference” Rule to Find Firm Affiliated with 27 Other Companies

By on July 2, 2014 | Posted in Small Business

One of the most fundamental requirements of Small Business Administration’s (SBA) size protest regulations is that the protested firm must timely produce information/documents that SBA requests to perform its investigation of the firm’s size/status. What is the penalty for failing to provide requested information/documents? SBA may presume the missing information would demonstrate that […]

The Danger of Uniformed and Inaccurate CPARs

By on July 1, 2014 | Posted in Bid Protests

In a recent bid protest decision concerning the Department of Energy’s award of legacy management support services award contract, GAO held that the agency acted reasonably when evaluating protestor WSS’s past performance on the incumbent contract by disregarding two Contractor Performance Assessment Reports (“CPARs”), which reflected “exceptional” performance, in favor of […]

2014 NDAA to Permit Prime Contractors to Count Lower Tier Subcontractors towards their Small Business Subcontracting Goals

Section 1614 of the National Defense Authorization Act for Fiscal Year 2014 (NDAA) offers advantages to small business subcontractors as well as prime contractors, by allowing primes to count second tier small businesses subcontracts toward their small business subcontracting goals. Previously, primes could only count first tier small business subcontractors […]

SBA Increases Women-Owned Small Business Opportunities

An interim rule, with immediate effect, will amend regulations to the U.S. Small Business Administration’s (“SBA”) Federal Contract Program, allowing for increased access to federal contracting opportunities for women-owned small businesses. This change comes as a result of the National Defense Authorization Act (“NDAA”) signed in January 2013. (For more […]

When a false certification may not be “false” under the False Claims Act

By on March 26, 2013 | Posted in False Claims Act

Government contractors routinely provide certifications during the contracting process. For example, these certifications ask the contractor to verify that the cost or pricing data or claims submitted are true and honest. Submitting a false claim can create liability under the Federal False Claims Act (“FCA”). See 31 U.S.C. § 3729. […]

More on NDAA 2013: Impact on the Small Business Administration

By on March 22, 2013 | Posted in Legislative and Regulatory Developments

As noted in our earlier blog entry, the National Defense Authorization Act of 2013 (“NDAA”), signed by President Obama on January 3, 2013 included significant changes affecting small business contracting. The changes largely came as a result of the House Armed Services Committee special “Panel on Business Challenges in the […]